Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFisher, Tahlia Jane
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-12T00:01:15Z
dc.date.available2017-07-12T00:01:15Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/11453
dc.descriptionListed in 2017 Dean's List of Exceptional Thesesen
dc.description.abstractAccurate information regarding the maintenance status of an aircraft is essential for safe and efficient airline operations, yet there is evidence to suggest that pilots and line maintenance engineers do not always communicate effectively with each other. To date the majority of this evidence has been anecdotal, and formal studies have focused primarily on the shortcomings of the aircraft logbook as a communication medium. Despite the notion that poor communication between these two groups can potentially have undesirable consequences, there has been little discussion about how this might manifest within an airline environment. The studies undertaken for this research examined three distinct aspects of the pilot-maintenance interface: 1) the intergroup relationship between airline pilots and line maintenance engineers, 2) operational radio communications between airline pilots and line maintenance engineers, and 3) the effects of deficient pilot-maintenance communication on aircraft operations and flight safety. Thematically analysed discourse from a series of focus groups held at a large New Zealand airline, found that communication difficulties are primarily the result of an interrelating set of organisational, physical and psychosocial barriers, all of which influence the nature of the intergroup relationship between pilots and line maintenance engineers. The use of Interaction Process Analysis (IPA) to examine radio calls between pilots and maintenance personnel identified that while the two groups share similar communication patterns and styles, indications of these barriers were present within their communication exchanges. The effects of deficient communication were then examined using data from the United States Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS). Using Correspondence Analysis (CA) to map associations between deficient pilot-maintenance communication and adverse outcomes, evidence was found that poor communication can be associated with both schedule disruptions and potential safety ramifications. Ultimately, this research has important implications for airlines, particularly given the degree to which organisational factors can influence the efficacy of communication between these two groups. In light of the findings which suggest that problematic interactions between pilots and maintenance personnel can have both commercial implications and pose a threat to flight safety, it is recommended that airlines give consideration to facilitating joint Crew Resource Management (CRM) training for these two groups.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMassey Universityen_US
dc.rightsThe Authoren_US
dc.subjectAirplanesen_US
dc.subjectMaintenance and repairen_US
dc.subjectPsychological aspectsen_US
dc.subjectAeronauticsen_US
dc.subjectHuman factorsen_US
dc.subjectInterpersonal communicationen_US
dc.subjectAir pilotsen_US
dc.subjectAviation mechanics (Persons)en_US
dc.subjectDean's List of Exceptional Thesesen
dc.titleCleared to disconnect? : a study of the interaction between airline pilots and line maintenance engineers : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Aviation at Massey University, Manawatũ, New Zealanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.grantorDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record