dc.contributor.author | Dodds S | |
dc.contributor.author | Russell-Bennett R | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen T | |
dc.contributor.author | Oertzen A-S | |
dc.contributor.author | Salvador-Carulla L | |
dc.contributor.author | Hung Y-C | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01-05 | |
dc.identifier | http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000740727700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=c5bb3b2499afac691c2e3c1a83ef6fef | |
dc.identifier.citation | JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (1), pp. 75 - 99 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2055-6225 | |
dc.description | | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose – The healthcare sector is experiencing a major paradigm shift toward a people-centered approach.
The key issue with transitioning to a people-centered approach is a lack of understanding of the ever-increasing role of technology in blended human-technology healthcare interactions and the impacts on healthcare actors’ well-being. The purpose of the paper is to identify the key mechanisms and influencing factors through which blended service realities affect engaged actors’ well-being in a healthcare context.
Design/methodology/approach – This conceptual paper takes a human-centric perspective and a value co creation lens and uses theory synthesis and adaptation to investigate blended human-technology service
realities in healthcare services.
Findings – The authors conceptualize three blended human-technology service realities – human-dominant,
balanced and technology-dominant – and identify two key mechanisms – shared control and emotional-social
and cognitive complexity – and three influencing factors – meaningful human-technology experiences, agency
and DART (dialogue, access, risk, transparency) – that affect the well-being outcome of engaged actors in these
blended human-technology service realities.
Practical implications – Managerially, the framework provides a useful tool for the design and management
of blended human-technology realities. The paper explains how healthcare services should pay attention to
management and interventions of different services realities and their impact on engaged actors. Blended human-technology reality examples – telehealth, virtual reality (VR) and service robots in healthcare – are used
to support and contextualize the study’s conceptual work. A future research agenda is provided.
Originality/value – This study contributes to service literature by developing a new conceptual framework
that underpins the mechanisms and factors that influence the relationships between blended human technology service realities and engaged actors’ well-being | |
dc.format.extent | 75 - 99 | |
dc.publisher | Emerald | |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC 4.0 | |
dc.subject | Blended human-technology service realities | |
dc.subject | People-centered healthcare | |
dc.subject | Shared control | |
dc.subject | DART | |
dc.subject | Well-being | |
dc.subject | Service robot | |
dc.subject | Covid-19 | |
dc.title | Blended human-technology service realities in healthcare | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.citation.volume | 32 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/JSTP-12-2020-0285 | |
dc.identifier.elements-id | 450253 | |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE | |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | |
dc.description.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University | |
pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University/Massey Business School | |
pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University/Massey Business School/School of Communication, Journalism and Marketing | |
dc.identifier.harvested | Massey_Dark | |
pubs.notes | Not known | |